Three tools in one. Project your payout income forward from consistent weekly performance. Work backward from an income goal to find the right account combination. Or build a month-by-month scaling roadmap from your first account to your target.
Pass one evaluation cleanly, achieve two full payout cycles, then add a second identical account at the same firm. Use the first payout from account 2 to fund account 3. Each account runs identically — same strategy, same session, same size. Payouts stack linearly.
Run 2–3 accounts at different firms simultaneously. If one firm changes rules, gets acquired, or experiences a payout delay, your income isn’t entirely dependent on them. Mix EOD trailing firms (Apex, MFF Pro, Lucid) with different payout schedules for income smoothing.
Start with $25K accounts to prove the strategy at lower drawdown risk. After 3 successful payout cycles, move to $50K. After 3 more, $100K. Each level requires demonstrating the same consistent performance at the new size before progressing. The larger account’s payout potential is significantly higher with the same trade.
Instead of withdrawing all payouts, use a portion to fund new evaluations. On a $50K MFF account generating $1,500/month at 90% split ($1,350 net), the $135 eval cost is 10% of one monthly payout. Adding one account per month for 6 months costs 6 evals ($810 total) and creates 6 income streams. The break-even on eval cost is <1 month per account.